In this map, we examined the five year ACS data for the state of New York on a county-by-county level. We observed the absolute count data, using the Natural Breaks (Jenks) classification method for our cut points. Upon observing just the state of New York, we could see a clear imbalance in the breaks due to the high density of New York City and the surrounding boroughs compared to the rest of the cities in the state. The counties surrounding the city having such a high density leads to socioeconomic factors that influence political alignment among residents. For example, the high population density leads to statistically higher living costs alongside poorer conditions, which is historically linked to the interest of the democratic party. This party benefits urban-dwelling citizens because they tend to advocate more for the needs of diverse populations, which tend to be found more commonly in cities. The high density can also lead to shared views among citizens in close proximity. Moving upstate, we see a much lower density due to more land availability. As we draw nearer to major cities (Syracuse, Albany, Rochester, and Buffalo), we find the density of the population increases, but not as exponentially as in the major boroughs of New York State. Due to lower cost of living and better economic conditions, these citizens are historically more inclined to vote for Republican candidates. The Republican Party tends to advocate for the objectives of upper class citizens.
1 comment:
I definitely agree with the reasoning behind the relationship between density and politics. I also really agree with the fact that if you have more people closer together, they are more likely to share the same views because they are more likely to talk and communicate, and people might not want to live somewhere if they have different political views, so it might influence their idea to live there.
Post a Comment